Antonio- I think adding some performance tests is a great idea, although I think it'll be challenging to separate Sling performance from the underlying JCR performance.
In general, my preference is for microbenchmarks to prove (or disprove) a particular design strategy. The changes you describe in SLING-2239 are good examples of changes which should be proven out with benchmarks before being applied. Justin On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Antonio Sanso <asa...@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > SLING-2239 [0] made me think that it might be useful to have a kind of > performance tests as for example > the one in Jackrabbit [1] in order to have periodical report as in [2]. > > Should you like the idea I might try to 'port' [1] to Sling (with all the > credits to Jackrabbit obviously :)) > > WDYT? > > Regards > > Antonio > > > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2239 > [1] > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/test/performance/base/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/performance/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/report-2011-08-25/report.html
