While I totally agree that we should try this, there is no way to enforce it - and it always depends on personal opinion about whether something is worth testing or is too simple to be tested - yes, I know better being safe than sorry.
So, basically +1 - but I don't consider this a blocker We have the same situation with documentation... Regards Carsten 2013/4/5 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > Hi, > > We just had a little ironic exchange with Carsten in SLING-2813...am I > the only one who thinks that all our core code should be covered by > automated tests? > > I don't mean requiring stupid 100% test coverage everywhere, as that > doesn't always make sense, but adding code to our core (i.e. under > /bundles) with no tests at all feels very wrong to me. > > Can we agree on requiring at least "decent" automated tests coverage > for everything that's under /bundles? > > -Bertrand > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
