I took me some time to fully grasp this proposal :) (although it's pretty simple).
Yes, I'm fine with removing the service + impl completely. What about having a util class like ResourceCollectionUtil.create(Resource parent, String name, Map<String, Object> optionalProperties) ? Carsten 2013/5/7 Amit.. Gupta. <[email protected]> > > I mean ResourceCollectionManager and ResourceCollectionManagerImpl of > course. > Yeah, I was wondering if it is just me little sleepy.. or you really > meant that :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Klimetschek [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 08 May 2013 01:35 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [COLLECTION] ResoucreCollectionManager > > On 07.05.2013, at 22:03, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This means we can remove both ResourceCollection and > ResourceCollectionImpl, unless I am missing something. > > I mean ResourceCollectionManager and ResourceCollectionManagerImpl of > course. > > Alex > > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
