On 01.07.2013, at 12:13, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...(3) Maybe we can find a better name for the AdapterMethodProvider >> interface -- something >> which is more in line with the AdapterFactory service name. > > I don't have a better name for now, and the service is really a > provider of adapter methods - it's not a Factory of anything. What about simply "AdapterProvider"? Nice idea btw. Cheers, Alex
