I'm more in the camp of fix-the-docs :) One could argue that higher priority means they have the most power and therefore are run last and can overrule everything previous filters have done - this again would be somehow in line with service ranking in general. In general, when there is a doubt and it's not clearly a bug, I would think that the implementation is right and the docs are wrong. Because this is what people are using and they might rely on current ordering. We can fix our code/configuration, but we can't fix custom code/installations out there.
Carsten 2013/7/2 Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com> > On 18.06.2013, at 15:19, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > So, I tend to switch over to the fix-the-implementation-camp. > > +1 > > It's what you expect (higher service ranking picked up first) and if the > wrong cases are few and can be easily handled (big documentation note to > sling users) that's definitely better. > > Cheers, > Alex > > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
