[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13739545#comment-13739545
 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-3015:
------------------------------------------

The X-Forwarded-For header is not appropriate: It may or may not be present for 
various reasons (security not be the least). So depending on this header for 
security reasons is inherently unsafe and thus insecure.
                
> Take X-Forwarded-For into account for IP whitelisting
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-3015
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3015
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>    Affects Versions: Discovery Impl 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Stefan Egli
>            Assignee: Stefan Egli
>
> Currently, the IP whitelisting for incoming topology connections of the 
> discovery.impl uses 'getRequestHost/Addr' to decide if it wants to accept a 
> connection or not. This is not sufficient in the case, where a server is 
> behind eg a reverse proxy. In such cases it would simply get the reverse 
> proxy's address, voiding the IP whitelisting feature.
> To improve this situation, the X-Forwarded-For header field should be 
> evaluated optionally too.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to