[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13756107#comment-13756107
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-3034:
-----------------------------------------
While I don't see why the bundle can't be named api, I'm fine with renaming it
to core.
Yes, this thing moves back and forth a little bit, but this is imho a good
thing as we're making good progress
> Check contents of healtchecks bundle
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-3034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3034
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Health Check
> Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
> Fix For: healthcheck-api 1.0.0
>
>
> The current healtchecks bundle seems to be a collection of completely
> different things. I think we should reduce this to the bare minimum as these
> services are API.
> I think the CompositeHealthCheck is fine, as well as the
> ScriptableHealthCheck and the JmxAttributeHealthCheck.
> But I think the DefaultLoginsHealthCheck and the
> SlingRequestStatusHealthCheck should rather be moved out. Checking this stuff
> might look nice, but it imho it doesn't really provide a huge value. If you
> want to check the status of a request than you have to go all the way, the
> client browser would go. Otherwise your server looks fine but still a user
> does not get anything.
> The OsgiScriptBinding looks like a sample to me, we should rather remove this
> for now. Bundle information should be availabel as jmx info anyway.
> All services are configuration factories (which is good) but set the name to
> "org.apache.sling.hc.{classname}". I think we should use the real package
> name here, I see no good reason to use some fake package name
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
