Hi Brenn, I'd suggest starting a new thread with your question. Regards, Justin
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Brenn Hill <brenn.h...@omnigon.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > From past projects I've seen Sling used as more of a front controller (with > lots of perks) and then the resource as the controller (optional) or just a > simple view(script)/model(jcr) binding. Usually the controller being an > invoked java class or service. > > This is how a number of projects I've been on have been structured. In this > case, where would sling models fit in? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Klimetschek [mailto:aklim...@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:27 PM > To: dev@sling.apache.org > Subject: Re: rename YAMF to Sling Models > > Sling Models _could_ be slightly confusing if you look at Sling as MVC: > > M = resources/jcr > V = scripts/servlets > C = sling engine > > Just my 2 cents, > Alex > > On 11.01.2014, at 04:47, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I'm +1 on the move, I'm not sure if Sling Models is a good name - as a >> non-native speaker, the plural looks strange to me. But I don't oppose >> if others are fine with it >> >> Carsten >> >> >> 2014/1/10 Justin Edelson <jus...@justinedelson.com> >> >>> I'd like to move YAMF from my whiteboard in to extensions and rename >>> it as Sling Models. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3313 >>> >>> Please speak up if you have an objection. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Justin >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> cziege...@apache.org >
