[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13873263#comment-13873263
]
Feike Visser commented on SLING-3320:
-------------------------------------
Little experiment:
{code}
@Service
@Component(immediate=true)
@Properties (
@Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING, intValue = 10, propertyPrivate =
false))
public class MyBindings2 implements BindingsValuesProvider {
@Override
public void addBindings(Bindings bindings) {
if ( bindings.get("test") == null) {
System.out.println("test not found!!!");
}
}
}
@Service
@Component(immediate=true)
@Properties (
@Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING, intValue = 10000, propertyPrivate =
false))
public class MyBindings implements BindingsValuesProvider {
@Override
public void addBindings(Bindings bindings) {
bindings.put("test", "test");
}
}
{code}
This works: so the higher the value the earlier it gets picked up.
Do you know if there is a default when no ranking is specified?
> Execution order of BindingsValuesProvider
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-3320
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3320
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Feike Visser
>
> I have implemented two basic BindingsValuesProviders like this.
> {code}
> @Service
> @Component(immediate=true)
> public class MyBindings implements BindingsValuesProvider {
> }
> {code}
> What I want to make sure is that they are *always* executed in the same
> order, first A, then B.
> Because I want to re-use objects that were set in the first
> BindingsValuesProvider.
> Currently I don't have a way to do this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
