[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14042363#comment-14042363
 ] 

Justin Edelson commented on SLING-3692:
---------------------------------------

[~dpfister] Vanity Paths (with or with SLING-3505) aren't differentiated from 
other mapping entries (i.e. /etc/map). Is this necessary? Also, for every 
sling:vanityPath, we actually create two map entries: one for the vanity path 
itself and one with a trailing regex, i.e. a sling:vanityPath of /foo, the 
created mappings are /foo$ and /foo(\..*). Do both of those make sense in this 
feed? Is that the right format?

> Provide access to list of vanity paths/aliases in SLING-3505
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-3692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3692
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ResourceResolver
>    Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Dominique Pfister
>
> In our infrastructure, we're using a web server in front of our application 
> hosting Sling, and this web server blocks a lot of requests based on their 
> URL, except those that actually map to a vanity path. In order to keep this 
> information up to date, a plugin in the web server periodically requests the 
> list of vanity paths from a servlet registered in Sling.
> It would be great if this servlet could have access to the internal list 
> built in SLING-3505, so it could benefit from the performance gain.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to