[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14306884#comment-14306884
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-4377:
----------------------------------------

I opened https://sourceforge.net/p/findbugs/bugs/1355/ to get more clarity on 
which annotations would be supported by both FindBugs and Eclipse.

> Add JSR305 annotations to Sling API
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-4377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4377
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>
> Since consumers of the Sling API always have to keep in mind whether a 
> null-check is necessary it would be good to add JSR 305 annotations to the 
> API.
> See also http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42199.html.
> At least Eclipse as well as Findbugs are supporting those and Oak Solr is 
> using those already (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2303).
> Only the following 3 annotations should be used:
> # {{@Nonnull}}, for return values which are not supposed to be {{null}}, the 
> parameters are usually covered by the {{@ParametersAreNonNullByDefault}} 
> annotation.
> # {{@CheckForNull}}, for return values wich may be null {{null}}}
> # {{@Nullable}}, for parameter which may be {{null}}, overwriting the 
> {{@ParametersAreNonNullByDefault}} annotation on package/class level
> # {{@ParametersAreNonNullByDefault}}, should only be used o package or class 
> level.
> Those are the only ones being supported by both Eclipse and Findbugs.
> Nullable is basically ignored by Findbugs 
> (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/manual/annotations.html) and should 
> therefore not be used. Eclipse can be configured so it can deal with 
> CheckForNull as well. Also Solr is only using {{@Nonnull}} and 
> {{@CheckForNull}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to