Hi Timothee, On 3/18/15 6:45 PM, "Timothée Maret" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Anyway, AFAIU enforcing 'leader != master' would be against an >> >active/passive setup. >> >Indeed, if enabled, an application could either process on exactly one >>crx >> >slave >> >> Right. Why would it be 'against' such a setup though? > > >Because it leads to writing on the slave and have changes replicated to >master where we would expect the slave to only receives replicated changes >from master in an active/passive setup. Agreed Cheers, Stefan
