On Monday 22 February 2016 18:39:23 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Oliver Lietz wrote > >> > >>> as we do no longer support Jackrabbit shouldn't we move > >>> jackrabbit-server to attic or contrib or simply remove it from SVN? > >> > >> Very good point, +1 - let's remove it. ... > > > > I would prefer that we keep such modules around, suggest a /attic folder. > > > > If someone is using such a module that we don't support anymore and > > needs to fix something in it, it's much easier if it's still in our > > source code tree. Not included in the main pom.xml, so we don't even > > care if it builds or not, but still there. > > We can move it to contrib for the time being
Well, there was a discussion at dev@felix some months ago about moving to Git successively and using one Git repo per module. I'm not sure what's the current state there (@Benson: can you tell us?), but in my opinion jackrabbit- server would be a perfect candidate to find out if it would work for us without breaking anything. If you agree I would file an issue at infra and start moving jackrabbit-server to Git. Regards, O. > Regards > Carsten
