[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15281473#comment-15281473
]
Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-5677:
----------------------------------------
[~bdelacretaz] Thanks for the review.
Regarding splitting things up, that would only make sense to split up between
a) junit.core and junit.teleporter and b) the actual sample. Splitting it up
even further is not useful as the changes in junit.core and junit.teleporter
depend on each other. WDYT?
Regarding the name "module-with-it" I definitely agree. I would propose to
rename actually both examples to better express their differences, but can't
come up with a good proposal right now.
> Provide default customizer for executing TeleporterRule tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-5677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5677
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Testing
> Affects Versions: JUnit Tests Teleporter 1.0.8
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>
> Currently for executing ITs leveraging {{TeleporterRule}} there need to be a
> Customizer referenced, otherwise those ITs would not be executed.
> There should be a DefaultCustomizer which should be used, when there is no
> other customizer referenced, which must support the following features:
> # setting baseUrl via system property
> # setting serverCredentials via system property
> # setting timeouts via system property
> # setting the dependencyPrefix (both includes and excludes) through system
> properties.
> For a reasoning have a look at the discussion in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@sling.apache.org/msg55723.html.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
