[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15389593#comment-15389593
]
Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-5886:
---------------------------------------
[~alexxx] what you describe is certainly correct for all system-level
configuration (esp. osgi configurations). for context-specific configuration
it's often more difficult because this configuration is directly related to the
content, and often it is managed on the production system itself by power-users
or site owners, and not by the devops team and their git repos. at least in our
experience and projects this is often the case.
> Sling Configuration - Initial Contribution
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-5886
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5886
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Stefan Seifert
> Assignee: Stefan Seifert
>
> as discussed in the mailing list (see [my post from april
> 2016|http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/RT-Use-cases-for-content-specific-configurations-in-Sling-amp-Contribution-td4060813.html])
> i want to contribute the wcm.io Configuration parts that are not
> AEM-specific.
> the current features of wcm.io Configuration are described here:
> http://wcm.io/config/
> the main goal is to support "context-specific" configuration, that means
> configuration that is different for different content paths (e.g. sites,
> tenants).
> during the contribution some changes and refactorings are required/planned,
> e.g.:
> * remove some dependencies to wcm.io build environment, Guava and others
> * remove the "application" distinction currently part of wcm.io Configuration
> in favor or a more path-based distinction
> * refactor the user-faced configuration API to further simplify it and
> support OSGi R6-style annotation classed for typed configuration access
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
