On Tuesday 26 July 2016 16:11:57 Ian Boston wrote: > Hi, > In the spirit of keeping it simple. > > Why not "Configuration" ? > > OSGi Configuration is nearly always referred to as "OSGi Configuration" by > those that use Sling/AEM. I think it's only referred to as Configuration by > those whose context is nearly always OSGi, ie OSGI developers. Most > deployers don't see Sling/AEM as an OSGi container, they see it as > Sling/AEM. Could be wrong about that.
+1 O. [...]
