> ok, understood. > > i'm wondering if we should introduce an explicit parameter into the > ConfigurationResourceResolver#getResource* methods to make it explicit that > each "high-level" configuration-whatever resolver should define it's own > "bucket" parent node, and not use the returned resource directly which may > mess up with the other high-level resolvers when conflicts with child nodes > occur. > Sounds good to me
Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland [email protected]
