[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15529517#comment-15529517 ]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-6056: ----------------------------------------- :) I understand that you think that method is required I don't understand why. Sorry, maybe my brain is really thinking in the wrong direction. So I'll wait for your patch and see what it changes. > achieve 1:1 mapping between observation and resource change listener > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SLING-6056 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6056 > Project: Sling > Issue Type: Task > Components: ResourceResolver > Affects Versions: JCR Resource 2.8.0, API 2.14.2, Resource Resolver 1.4.18 > Reporter: Stefan Egli > Assignee: Stefan Egli > Priority: Critical > Fix For: JCR Resource 2.8.2, API 2.15.0, Resource Resolver 1.4.20 > > Attachments: SLING-6056.patch > > > At the moment it seems there is a 1:n mapping between 1 OakResourceListener > (and 1 BasicObservationReporter) and n ResourceChangeListeners. The idea > however is to get rid of such a bottleneck and have a 1:1 mapping (that might > or might not be in the BasicObservationReporter, that I don't know). We > should implement such a 1:1 mapping. > See [thread on dev list|http://sling.markmail.org/thread/uwhda777psgklwo6] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)