On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...I don't know if Karaf has anything compared to crankstart, maybe there
> is or we could contribute it - which again would have a much larger
> outreach than Sling...

I agree with that but also with Ian that our provisioning model suits
Sling extremely well, it's powerful, concise and so much nicer to
write and read that the XML that Karaf (IIUC) forces you to use.

Without having looked into the details my favorite option right now
would be to switch to Karaf, assuming it's better than Crankstart, but
continue to use our provisioning model supported by an "invisible"
translator.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to