Stefan Seifert wrote > in [1] oliver mentioned the usage of property names in the current > implementation: > > sling:config-ref > sling:config-collection-inherit > sling:config-property-inherit > > should we use headless camel case instead? is this more consistent with the > other parts of sling? > > sling:configRef > sling:configCollectionInherit > sling:configPropertyInherit > > As mentioned as a response to Olli camel case would be more consistent. So if it is not too much work, we should change it. Otherwise I think it is not that important.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
