Well, I personally think you'd be better of recutting the release. After all, release votes are pretty much for the purpose of making sure there are no legal issues with the release and not having the proper licenses in place isn't good.
That said, if you fix it in trunk and get the majority of the votes I suppose it isn't the end of the world as there are already releases of the binary with this issue. In other words, up to you (and maybe on how much work is involved in recutting the release) but I would just declare this vote to continue for the Engine only (so you don't have to recut that one) and start a new one for the compiler. regards, Karl On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Radu Cotescu <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Karl, > > I guess we should. Do you consider this a release blocker or can I just add > them into a separate commit? > > Cheers, > Radu > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 at 15:52 Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> Shouldn't they be added to the LICENSE file? >> -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
