[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15889795#comment-15889795
]
Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-6578:
----------------------------------------
"service.pid" doesn't seem to be a good choice either (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5839). So the question is what id
can be used which allows even to bind to a configurator component with a
specific configuration.
> Use "service.pid" property instead of class name to reference validators
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-6578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6578
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>
> Leveraging the component's "service.pid" property value instead of its
> classname is more stable (even if implementation changes, the PID might stay
> the same) and also allows for configuration factories to refer to a specific
> validator configuration.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
