Vote is cancelled due to incomplete fix for https://issues.apache.org/j
ira/browse/SLING-6261. 

Thanks,

Robert

On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 13:41 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> To be on the safe side, I'll restart the vote since we changed the
> set
> of artifacts.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert
> 
> On Sun, 2017-09-24 at 00:13 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> > Please cancel only the vote for Thread Support, I am hoping to come
> > up with a fix next week.
> > Konrad 
> > 
> > 
> > Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> > 
> > > Am 23.09.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.or
> > > g>
> > > :
> > > 
> > > Konrad, Stefan,
> > > 
> > > What's your take on this? Should I cancel the vote and wait for a
> > > fix
> > > or go through with the release and fire off another release vote
> > > for
> > > the commons.threads bundles once we have a fix?
> > > 
> > > Robert
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 12:25 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> > > > For me the test runs fine with both Java 7 and Java 8.
> > > > But according to your stack traces it seems that the table
> > > > array
> > > > within ThreadLocalMap contains some null entries (compare with
> > > > https:
> > > > //doanduyhai.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/threadlocal-explained/).
> > > > The entry objects within the table are WeakReferences
> > > > themselves,
> > > > i.e. can become null if the key = the threadLocal object bound
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > thread is no longer referenced.
> > > > 
> > > > Currently the diff method does not correctly deal with it.
> > > > I will first try to make an IT which does reliably fail for
> > > > everyone
> > > > and then try to come up with a fix.
> > > > Thanks for reporting.
> > > > Konrad
> > > > 
> > > > > On 21. Sep 2017, at 10:48, Stefan Seifert <sseifert@pro-visio
> > > > > n.
> > > > > de>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Sling Thread Support 3.2.8
> > > > > -> i've a problem running the unit tests. the run fine, up to
> > > > > rev.
> > > > > 1790774, but fail from rev. 1791091 (SLING-6261). is it only
> > > > > on
> > > > > my
> > > > > machine? see below
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Sling Scripting Core implementation 2.0.48
> > > > > +1
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Event Support 4.2.8
> > > > > +1
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Sling SlingStart Maven Plugin 1.7.10
> > > > > +1
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Sling JUnit Tests Teleporter 1.0.16
> > > > > +1
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apache Sling Testing Utilities 2.1.2
> > > > > +1
> > > > > 
> > > > > stefan
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > unit test errors in thread support 3.2.8:
> > > > > 
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > T E S T S
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Running
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ExtendedThreadFactoryTe
> > > > > st
> > > > > Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > > > elapsed:
> > > > > 0.002 sec - in
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ExtendedThreadFactoryTe
> > > > > st
> > > > > Running
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocalsTest
> > > > > Exception in thread "pool-9-thread-1"
> > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.chan
> > > > > ge
> > > > > d(Th
> > > > > readLocalCleaner.java:140)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.diff
> > > > > (T
> > > > > hrea
> > > > > dLocalCleaner.java:104)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.clea
> > > > > nu
> > > > > p(Th
> > > > > readLocalCleaner.java:79)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocals.afterExecute(ThreadPoolExecutorCleaningThreadLocals
> > > > > .j
> > > > > ava:
> > > > > 63)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolE
> > > > > xe
> > > > > cuto
> > > > > r.java:1150)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPool
> > > > > Ex
> > > > > ecut
> > > > > or.java:617)
> > > > >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > > > > Exception in thread "pool-9-thread-2"
> > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.chan
> > > > > ge
> > > > > d(Th
> > > > > readLocalCleaner.java:140)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.diff
> > > > > (T
> > > > > hrea
> > > > > dLocalCleaner.java:104)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadLocalCleaner.clea
> > > > > nu
> > > > > p(Th
> > > > > readLocalCleaner.java:79)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocals.afterExecute(ThreadPoolExecutorCleaningThreadLocals
> > > > > .j
> > > > > ava:
> > > > > 63)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolE
> > > > > xe
> > > > > cuto
> > > > > r.java:1150)
> > > > >       at
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPool
> > > > > Ex
> > > > > ecut
> > > > > or.java:617)
> > > > >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > > > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > > > elapsed:
> > > > > 0.192 sec <<< FAILURE! - in
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocalsTest
> > > > > testThreadLocalBeingCleanedUp(org.apache.sling.commons.thread
> > > > > s.
> > > > > impl
> > > > > .ThreadPoolExecutorCleaningThreadLocalsTest)  Time elapsed:
> > > > > 0.046
> > > > > sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > > > > org.mockito.exceptions.verification.WantedButNotInvoked:
> > > > > Wanted but not invoked:
> > > > > listener.changed(
> > > > >   ADDED,
> > > > >   <any>,
> > > > >   java.lang.ThreadLocal@3632be31,
> > > > >   "test"
> > > > > );
> > > > > -> at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocalsTest.testThreadLocalBeingCleanedUp(ThreadPoolExecuto
> > > > > rC
> > > > > lean
> > > > > ingThreadLocalsTest.java:60)
> > > > > Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
> > > > > 
> > > > >       at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocalsTest.testThreadLocalBeingCleanedUp(ThreadPoolExecuto
> > > > > rC
> > > > > lean
> > > > > ingThreadLocalsTest.java:60)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Results :
> > > > > 
> > > > > Failed tests:
> > > > > ThreadPoolExecutorCleaningThreadLocalsTest.testThreadLocalBei
> > > > > ng
> > > > > Cle
> > > > > anedUp:60
> > > > > Wanted but not invoked:
> > > > > listener.changed(
> > > > >   ADDED,
> > > > >   <any>,
> > > > >   java.lang.ThreadLocal@3632be31,
> > > > >   "test"
> > > > > );
> > > > > -> at
> > > > > org.apache.sling.commons.threads.impl.ThreadPoolExecutorClean
> > > > > in
> > > > > gThr
> > > > > eadLocalsTest.testThreadLocalBeingCleanedUp(ThreadPoolExecuto
> > > > > rC
> > > > > lean
> > > > > ingThreadLocalsTest.java:60)
> > > > > Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:57 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@sling.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Thread Support 3.2.8,
> > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > Sling
> > > > > > Scripting Core implementation 2.0.48, Apache Event Support
> > > > > > 4.2.8,
> > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > Sling SlingStart Maven Plugin 1.7.10, Apache Sling JUnit
> > > > > > Tests
> > > > > > Teleporter
> > > > > > 1.0.16, Apache Sling Testing Utilities 2.1.2
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is a catch-all release vote for some modules I saw had
> > > > > > changes but
> > > > > > no releases. Due to a network hiccup they are split into 2
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > repositories.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > There are 20 fixes included in these releases:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion
> > > > > > /1
> > > > > > 233
> > > > > > 5535
> > > > > > ( 5 issues )
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12
> > > > > > 33
> > > > > > 995
> > > > > > 3 (
> > > > > > 6 issues )
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12
> > > > > > 34
> > > > > > 105
> > > > > > 7 (
> > > > > > 2 issues )
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12
> > > > > > 34
> > > > > > 140
> > > > > > 6 (
> > > > > > 2 issues )
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12
> > > > > > 34
> > > > > > 156
> > > > > > 2 (
> > > > > > 1 issue )
> > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12
> > > > > > 33
> > > > > > 914
> > > > > > 0 (
> > > > > > 4 issues )
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Staging repositories:
> > > > > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapa
> > > > > > ch
> > > > > > esli
> > > > > > ng-1
> > > > > > 789
> > > > > > -   - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/or
> > > > > > ga
> > > > > > pach
> > > > > > esli
> > > > > > ng-1790
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and
> > > > > > verify
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > signatures:
> > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/check_staged_re
> > > > > > le
> > > > > > ase.
> > > > > > sh
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Usage:
> > > > > > sh check_staged_release.sh 1789 /tmp/sling-staging
> > > > > > sh check_staged_release.sh 1790 /tmp/sling-staging
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > > > > [ ]  0 Don't care
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Robert
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to