On Tuesday 10 October 2017 11:39:11 Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Monday 09 October 2017 21:57:34 Robert Munteanu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > > > Given that we're going to have a single samples repository, would > > > it > > > make sense to move the modules from under testing/samples under > > > samples/testing? > > > > > > testing/samples/ > > > > > > > -- bundle-with-it > > > > > > `-- module-with-it > > > > > > I would also rename the artifact ids from > > > org.apache.sling.testing.samples.FOO to > > > org.apache.sling.samples.testing.FOO . > > > > can we agree on common group id and package name for samples – at > > least for > > unreleased and new samples? > > I would suggest org.apache.sling.samples . We can also use > org.apache.sling.samples.testing for testing samples, but that's > optional for me, we can stick with one group id.
+1 > > Btw, why do we not create one repo per sample? > > As noted at [1]: "having samples spread over multiple repositories will > make it harder for users to discover all of them" I see – thanks, Robert (would have added a reactor and repo manifest for samples instead). O. > Robert > > [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Move+from+Subver > sion+to+Git
