On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 11:38 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: > What about sling-reactor? > > This is a familiar naming in Maven [0] and IMHO that repo shouldn’t > only contain a repo manifest but also a reactor pom. > > [0] - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2050241/what-is-the-reactor > -in-maven
My intention would be to provide support for multiple tools. Google repo and Maven would be one. I think it would be good to also generate a gitslave file ( which is trivial ) for people who prefer that. So I'd be wary of naming the repository is a way which is too specific to a certain tool, which is why I avoided names like 'sling-manifest', a repo-specific name. It's not a big deal though if others find it more intuitive. Robert
