Hi Jason, > On 17 Jul 2019, at 15:16, Jason E Bailey <jason.bai...@24601.org> wrote: > > My opinion - I'd prefer a greater decoupling of the API and implementations. > We should be able to design this in such a way that the addition of a new > format for parsing content doesn't necessitate a release of the API. To that > end, I think the ParserOptions should not be a final class but encompass the > generic options available to all content parsers and then have extended > classes in the other packages that reflect the ParserOptions for that package. > > So there'd be a JsonParserOptions which extends ParserOptions and contains > json specific options. > > So for me to implement a YamlContentParser I should just be able to implement > the appropriate classes and install an implementation package. > > That would also mean moving implementation specific files to their respective > packages as well, like the JsonParserFeatures > > -- > Jason >
Duly noted. I’ll try to implement these changes tomorrow. Cheers, Radu
