SLING-8479: I provided a fix for that and it was merged into master so I marked that ticket as resolved.
SLING-8483: I do not think this is a high priority for this release. Cheers - Andy > On Jul 29, 2019, at 8:24 AM, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 17:34, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> +1 for a release. >> >> The analyser, modelconverter, launcher have open issues. Not sure how >> important they are. >> > > For the analyser, I think we can postpone SLING-8594, maybe the analyser > described in this issue is already covered in another way. I've move the > issue for the moment to 1.0.8. > > For the model converter, @Andy Schaefer do you think SLING-8479 is urgent? > If so would you be able to contribute a patch? > For the launcher, @Andy Schaefer do you think SLING-8483 is urgent? If so > would you be able to contribute a patch? > > Other than these 3 there are no open issues on he analyser, modelconverter > and launcher. > > >> >> Both extensions (apiregions and content) have no issues at all, so I >> don't think we need a release. Unless the issues are not in jira of course. >> > > On this topic, there have been changes in the core Feature Model, and these > extensions pick the core Feature Model up via Maven dependencies when they > are run in a Maven context. Therefore I think we need to update their > dependencies to the latest Feature Model, otherwise the problem arises that > different Feature Model releases end up on the same classpath in Maven. And > given the update of the dependency they need a new release. > In an OSGi runtime you wouldn't have this problem, but since this a flat > classpath in Maven I think we need a release of these. > > Or is there a better way to handle this? > > >> The slingstart plugin has no issues for the upcoming release either. But >> I assume it depends on some of the other modules? >> > > Yes same classpath issue as described for the extensions... > > >> The slingfeature plugin has one open issue, SLING-8541, which I would >> like to get resolved before a release. As soon as the proposed solution >> is agreed on, I can implement it. > > > I'll wait for the discussion on SLING-8541 to conclude. > > Best regards, > > David