SLING-8479: I provided a fix for that and it was merged into master so I marked 
that ticket as resolved.

SLING-8483: I do not think this is a high priority for this release.

Cheers - Andy

> On Jul 29, 2019, at 8:24 AM, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 17:34, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> +1 for a release.
>> 
>> The analyser, modelconverter, launcher have open issues. Not sure how
>> important they are.
>> 
> 
> For the analyser, I think we can postpone SLING-8594, maybe the analyser
> described in this issue is already covered in another way. I've move the
> issue for the moment to 1.0.8.
> 
> For the model converter, @Andy Schaefer do you think SLING-8479 is urgent?
> If so would you be able to contribute a patch?
> For the launcher, @Andy Schaefer do you think SLING-8483 is urgent? If so
> would you be able to contribute a patch?
> 
> Other than these 3 there are no open issues on he analyser, modelconverter
> and launcher.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Both extensions (apiregions and content) have no issues at all, so I
>> don't think we need a release. Unless the issues are not in jira of course.
>> 
> 
> On this topic, there have been changes in the core Feature Model, and these
> extensions pick the core Feature Model up via Maven dependencies when they
> are run in a Maven context. Therefore I think we need to update their
> dependencies to the latest Feature Model, otherwise the problem arises that
> different Feature Model releases end up on the same classpath in Maven. And
> given the update of the dependency they need a new release.
> In an OSGi runtime you wouldn't have this problem, but since this a flat
> classpath in Maven I think we need a release of these.
> 
> Or is there a better way to handle this?
> 
> 
>> The slingstart plugin has no issues for the upcoming release either. But
>> I assume it depends on some of the other modules?
>> 
> 
> Yes same classpath issue as described for the extensions...
> 
> 
>> The slingfeature plugin has one open issue, SLING-8541, which I would
>> like to get resolved before a release. As soon as the proposed solution
>> is agreed on, I can implement it.
> 
> 
> I'll wait for the discussion on SLING-8541  to conclude.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David

Reply via email to