@Stefan: thanks for the summary. +1 IMHO that captures the main points of the discussion well.
Regards Julian On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 6:37 PM Stefan Seifert <sseif...@pro-vision.de> wrote: > > i try to write a first summary: > > - we have good use cases for a rewriter in general, but are unhappy with the > current implementation and it's way of configuration. the whole thing is a > bit "alien" to the other parts of sling. > > - a new rewriter implementation should be performant and with up-to-date > support for modern HTML. ideally something like SAX for HTML (not XML/XHTML). > this would not cover other use cases producing something other than HTML, > though. perhaps there are libraries out there that can be built upon. should > also provide modular support, e.g. rewriting only the output of a single > component or text fragment. maybe someone can come up with a proposal. > > - we have to keep the old rewriter for backward compatibility because it was > used a lot in the past, but do not plan to maintain it further and probably > will remove it from the sling starter as well. mark it as deprecated or > contrib. > > - we do no longer want to use the rewriter for link validation and > externalization, but support this as aspect in another, more appropriate way > (with some basic support or hooks/SPIs from Sling itself, the rest is more up > to upstream layers). we have currently only very rough ideas here, a proposal > needs to be draftet as well. > > stefan > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jason E Bailey [mailto:jason.bai...@24601.org] > >Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 6:09 PM > >To: dev@sling.apache.org > >Subject: Re: Why get rid of the rewriter? > > > >I'm positive towards the concept of the rewriter, a utility that provides > >centralized features that addresses cross-cutting concerns with user > >generated content. > > > >I'm not a fan of the current implementation of the rewriter. > > > >1. As Ruben pointed out, as of HTML5 html doesn't have anything to do > >with XML. There is no concept of namespace in HTML now. There is no self > >closing tag. There may not be an end tag. There is a concept of implied > >parent tags. > > > >2. TagSoup, which is currently used to parse the HTML, requires fully > >cached content and will attempt to validate the content and add to it, > >where appropriate. Which isn't necessary. > > > >3. The Rewriter requires the pipeline configuration to be in a specific > >place with a specific name which is inflexible and contrary to other tools > >we use. > > > > > >The point being that I would prefer to have the rewriter implementation > >deprecated in favor of a more up to date solution then having the concept > >of the rewriter deprecated. > > > > > > > >-- > >Jason > > > >On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Ruben Reusser wrote: > >> As was pointed out before the rewriter is used in a lot of projects for > >> other things than rewriting links (in our case we use it a lot to inject > >> legal disclaimers or content fragment models) > >> > >> The bigger problem however is that it assumes hml == xml and hence can > >not > >> deal with attributes with no value > >> > >> Ruben > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 5:12 AM Bertrand Delacretaz > ><bdelacre...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:07 PM Jason E Bailey <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > ...Can anyone summarize why we are getting rid of it?... > >> > > >> > I'm not sure if we need to "get rid" of that module, even if some > >> > portion of Sling users stops using it. > >> > > >> > The proposal at [1] says the rewriter should be "deprecated and no > >> > longer used", which is apparently what was discussed at the adaptTo > >> > round table or hackathon. > >> > > >> > If people still find the module useful I think it''s fine to move it > >> > to "contrib" status instead of deprecating. As long as there's a > >> > reasonable expectation that the module will be maintained I think > >> > that's a realistic status, but our guarantees are weak for contrib > >> > modules so there's no pressure. > >> > > >> > And if other modules provide better ways of doing similar things, link > >> > to them from the rewriter's docs. > >> > > >> > -Bertrand > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > > >https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c80093524461d7203fa9799b79ebbf6bfd1bb3 > >f9795865f4aaf3cd4a@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> thank you > >> > >> Ruben Reusser > >> CTO, headwire.com, Inc > >> > >
