[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16946791#comment-16946791
]
Angela Schreiber commented on SLING-8757:
-----------------------------------------
[~bdelacretaz] agreed... i am all fine with making it explicit. just
interpreted your initial suggestion such that it would be a 5th separate way to
set policy changes :)
> Add option to set/edit access control policies at user homes
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-8757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8757
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Repoinit
> Reporter: Angela Schreiber
> Priority: Major
>
> [~rombert], while looking into moving all service user creation and
> permission setup from content packages to repo init, i noticed that there is
> one special case that doesn't seem to be covered by repo init but possible
> with Jackrabbit content packages: creating/editing access control policies at
> a user home. the path of those is an implementation detail and cannot be
> 'guessed'.
> based on my previous work on the repo-init grammar, i could envision the
> following main options to include this functionality.
> # explicitly extend the 'path-token' which is currently defined to be
> {{(PATH_STRING> | t = <PATH_REPOSITORY>)}} to something like {{(PATH_STRING>
> | t = <PATH_REPOSITORY> | <USER_ID>)}}.
> # similar to the first one: but don't touch the grammar just extend the
> jcr-implementation: if 'path' is a relative path and is not _repository_,
> treat it as userId and try to obtain a path from the corresponding user
> object.
> # completely separate it from the 'pathList' and don't allow a combination of
> absolute paths, repository-marker and userIds, explicitly include the notion
> that the edited policy is not bound to a regular path but to a user home....
> instead of {{on /abspath, repository}} it then would e.g. say {{on user id1,
> id2}}
> without having looked into it in great detail and given the fact that there
> are already so many different ways to edit access control content with
> repo-init, the first option would feel the most natural to me.
> wdyt? i could try to come up with a patch/tests/docu, but i would love to
> avoid investing a lot of time and then have to throw it away or redo it all
> over again.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
