Ashish Chopra created SLING-9017:
------------------------------------
Summary: ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy ends up using an incorrect
QueueProvider
Key: SLING-9017
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9017
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Ashish Chopra
Currently, {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} [0] interface dictates that the
{{.add}} [1] method supplies the {{DistributionQueueProvider}} [1] to it.
For {{ForwardDistributionAgentFactory}} (and perhaps other Agent-factories as
well), this {{DistributionQueueProvider}} is further used to {{.getQueue}} by a
name [2].
As the discussion in SLING-8854 concluded, it was found acceptable [3] for
{{DistributionQueue}} impls and {{DistributionQueueProvider}} impls to share
state - concordantly, there needs to be a way for Agent-Factories to dictate
which _specific_ queue-providers they want {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} to
use.
One approach to make that happen would be to enhance
{{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} with another CTOR to accept a
{{DistributionQueueProvider}} argument. The impl of {{.add}} can then treat the
supplied {{DistributionQueueProvider}} at the time of API invocation as a
'hint' and ignore it if the {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} already has one
of its own.
[0]
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/impl/ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy.java
[1]
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/537bb57af821f21537cf4a24ad7d2347c6a5dae1/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/impl/ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy.java#L56
[2]
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/537bb57af821f21537cf4a24ad7d2347c6a5dae1/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/agent/impl/SimpleDistributionAgentQueueProcessor.java#L187
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8854?focusedCommentId=16982396&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16982396
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)