Ashish Chopra created SLING-9017:
------------------------------------

             Summary: ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy ends up using an incorrect 
QueueProvider
                 Key: SLING-9017
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9017
             Project: Sling
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Ashish Chopra


Currently, {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} [0] interface dictates that the 
{{.add}} [1] method supplies the {{DistributionQueueProvider}} [1] to it.

For {{ForwardDistributionAgentFactory}} (and perhaps other Agent-factories as 
well), this {{DistributionQueueProvider}} is further used to {{.getQueue}} by a 
name [2].

As the discussion in SLING-8854 concluded, it was found acceptable [3] for 
{{DistributionQueue}} impls and {{DistributionQueueProvider}} impls to share 
state - concordantly, there needs to be a way for Agent-Factories to dictate 
which _specific_ queue-providers they want {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} to 
use.

One approach to make that happen would be to enhance 
{{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}}  with another CTOR to accept a 
{{DistributionQueueProvider}} argument. The impl of {{.add}} can then treat the 
supplied {{DistributionQueueProvider}} at the time of API invocation as a 
'hint' and ignore it if the {{ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy}} already has one 
of its own.

[0] 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/impl/ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy.java
[1] 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/537bb57af821f21537cf4a24ad7d2347c6a5dae1/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/impl/ErrorQueueDispatchingStrategy.java#L56
[2] 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/537bb57af821f21537cf4a24ad7d2347c6a5dae1/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/agent/impl/SimpleDistributionAgentQueueProcessor.java#L187
[3] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8854?focusedCommentId=16982396&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16982396



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to