[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17190385#comment-17190385
]
Eric Norman commented on SLING-8309:
------------------------------------
FYI: I see no objections to my July comment so I opened SLING-9719 which is
similar to this one but with a smaller scope where dynamic CommitHooks were not
considered.
If there is consensus that dynamic CommitHooks are not a good idea then perhaps
this issue should be closed and the dynamic EditorProvider support can be
handled by the SLING-9719 changes?
> Allow adding CommitHooks and EditorProviders dynamically from bundles
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-8309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8309
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Oak
> Reporter: Sergiu Dumitriu
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently, {{OakSlingRepositoryManager}} uses a hard-coded list of
> {{CommitHook}} and {{EditorProvider}} to be used by the Oak repository. This
> means that other than building a patched version of
> {{OakSlingRepositoryManager}} there's no way to include a new commit
> observer. Ideally, a single pseudo-\{{CommitHook}} and
> pseudo-\{{EditorProvider}} should be handled to Oak, and these should just
> dynamically aggregate all the {{CommitHook}} and {{EditorProvider}} instances
> registered in the {{Whiteboard}}.
> All the currently hardcoded components are already available in the
> whiteboard, so no functionality will be lost, but this change will
> automatically enable support for {{mix:atomicCounter}} via the
> {{AtomicCounterEditorProvider}} that's not used at the moment.
> The old behavior should still be available via a new configuration,
> {{OakSlingRepositoryManagerConfiguration#dynamic_components}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
