http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3762





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-08 17:40 -------
yeah -- I wasn't bothered about requiring an attachment, because it's a 
one-liner.

regarding the "plugin-ization" -- I was anticipating it being more than just new
eval rules -- also allows the definition of new rule *types* (see URIBL).   but
the big problem is that it's hard to *anticipate* where a plugin call may be
useful.  the overhead of a new plugin hook should be very minor, though, so we
can probably pepper them a bit more liberally...



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to