http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3780
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-15 13:20 ------- Subject: Re: ability to decode less than full attachment with decode() On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:31:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would suspect it's to match the initial bytes of a binary for the MSExec > plugin. Well, the MSExec plugin currently matches the encoded version, so there's no extra memory usage. Quinlan's version can look at the decoded version which is where the problem comes up. My issue is that I don't want to impact the 99% of calls which want to decode the whole part because some people may want to implement some kind of attachment check. That said, while waiting for my car to be serviced I drew up some thoughts about how to do a partial decode when necessary. Most of it comes down to how M::SA::Util::decode_base64 does its thing. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
