[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> BTW we really need to go via bugzilla to discuss this. history
> has shown that there are too many issues and patches to deal with
> via the lists alone, and they *will* get lost that way.
Dean thinks the bugzilla license is onerous:
i have a bug to report, but i refuse to agree to the ASLv2 just to report
a bug. i suggest you guys stop being so anal.
I think that's not unreasonable. I modified bugzilla to say:
# Understand that SpamAssassin is a project of the Apache Software
Foundation and is licensed under the terms and conditions of the
Apache Software License version 2.0.
# Have read and understand the terms and conditions of the Apache
Software License version 2.0.
# Certify that any object code, source code, patch, documentation, etc.,
that you may supply can be redistributed under the same license terms
and conditions as SpamAssassin itself.
Which means you only agree for contributions supplied via bugzilla, but
not the bug report itself. Better?
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
