On Tuesday, April 6, 2004, 4:52:54 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Justin added a "urirhsbl" test to the URIBL module, so I retested on my > last 4 days of spam (the ham here ranges from 0 to 10 months old) using > SURBL and it exceeded my highest expectations.
> OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 6491 1497 4994 0.231 0.00 0.00 (all messages) > 100.000 23.0627 76.9373 0.231 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) > 13.804 59.8530 0.0000 1.000 1.00 0.01 T_URIBL_SC_SURBL > 14.374 61.5230 0.2403 0.996 0.99 1.00 URIBL_SBL > 0.277 0.8016 0.1201 0.870 0.55 1.00 URIBL_DSBL > I went ahead and promoted T_URIBL_SC_SURBL to URIBL_SC_SURBL Thanks much for the test data Daniel! Can I ask for a clarification of whether urirhsbl in URIBL is doing name resolution before comparing to SURBL, or whether it's comparing "names to names"? I tried to look for urirhsbl in the sources at: http://spamassassin.org/full/3.0.x/dist/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm but I'm not looking in the right place since I don't see it there. Given the 60% hit rate, I assume it's doing name to name. If so, awesome! Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
