-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > > According to the SPF people, we shouldn't > > be using -all on a domain that may possible emit mail > > Even if, as I think, ~all is correct if you can enumerate all legal > senders for the domain, there still is a problem with making our test > depend on the current configuration of something that is being used for > some other purpose. There is always the risk that there will be a reason > for changing the configuration. > > I got an idea from the tests in Mail::SPF::Query. How about if you > define a spf-test.spamassassin.org domain with an SPF record with ~all. > Then you are guaranteed that it will generate a fail but it can't mess > up any real email. +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCJDO7MJF5cimLx9ARAo6mAJ0S0fxuVsaqo4ipR7d0iEZooi5OfgCeLH2g 6z3LUKYeey4uIkiTKk2hMQg= =Y3zB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
