http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 11:48 ------- Subject: Re: Suggestion for new rule: Anti-phishing rule. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Doing a rule that looks for: > > link: http://.* > text: https://.* > > Meaning the text is implying greater security than provided. Yes, exactly. I can't see why this would lead to false-positives unless someone has made a (very specific) typo. I don't even check the host name or IP address parts. This won't catch a lot of phish, but judging from what I've seen, it should get about 15-25% of them. I'm not extremely familiar with the innards of SpamAssassin's HTML parser; I'll have to look into that. But this would clearly better be done as an eval rule than a regexp rule. Regards, David. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
