http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 05:29 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 03:26 ------- > > As I consider this again. I think it won't be a good idea to learn > automatically > if triggered for report/revoke. > - report/revoke would produce some (network) overhead if done everytime a > message is learned (especially no one remembers that report/revoke happens > when > learning is done) > - no need for a seperate spamc switch (-L already implemented) > I'am not amused not to overthink the user part. > Please introduce to query the 'use_Razor2' (and other) settings from SQL/ > userpref and use that for reporting!? I think it should be! > Sorry, but I've another opinion about that :-) The code will use all of the same mechanisms that it does now, so there is nothing to think about here. If -L is specified then it won't be available, period. If use_razor2 is set to 0 then we won't report/revoke fomr razor, so on and so forth. Learning either as spam for reporting or as ham for revoking is just how that code works. Like I said, I think you are overthinking. > > >We could go simple and do something like: > >Reported: Yes > >Reported: No > > I vote for that. +1 :-) > > >Did you pick out command line options? > > Not as you considered. I've simply add an switch (-W) to spamc! Too, there > are > some others free. Not perfectly but it works. Works for me, it is easily changed if for some reason it doesn't work out. FYI, here is the output I just got from spamd: 2329] dbg: markup: removing markup [2329] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2=HASH(0x8dadbd4) implements 'plugin_revoke' [2329] dbg: info: entering helper-app run mode [2329] dbg: info: leaving helper-app run mode [2329] dbg: reporter: spam revoked from Razor [2329] info: spamd: revoked ham message for parker:1000 in 0.7 seconds, 2569 bytes Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
