On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:39:17AM -0500, Michael Parker wrote: > > Also, anyone feel like taking on the spamc portion? I've already lost > enough hair, I would hate to pull the rest of it out. >
Ok, I'm working on this now.
Question for those who care.
Right now libspamc has:
message_process
message_learn
message_collabreport
I'm contemplating getting rid of message_learn and
message_collabreport and just offering message_tell, where you pass in
what you want to do and get back what it did.
Here is the message_tell prototype:
int message_tell(struct transport *tp, const char *username, int flags,
struct message *m, int set, int *didset,
int remove, int *didremove)
set, didset, remove, and didremove are bitmasks, for local and/or
remote.
Thoughts?
I might go ahead and change message_collabreport to message_report and
be done with it.
Michael
pgpwdTnUQ6Gp7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
