http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4351
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 00:09 ------- Subject: Re: spamc broken in trunk on win32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I see no reason to use uint instead of the completely portable unsigned int. > It > isn't like the variables in question are defined as uint in some system header > that we can't change. +1 > As for strncasecmp, that might be handled cleanly by #define SA_STRNCASECMP as > either strncasecmp or strnicmp in a header. +0.5 -- the general usage is something like "sa_strncasecmp", lowercase. (I did a *lot* of C/autoconf portability work with PLP in the 90's ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCkYFxMJF5cimLx9ARAgHDAJwM/Ee3+k/b2QBVdzS5dJUIRmFMxACfbf16 ZhANXCQH28ZIcIGL7r5pWHo= =3HDZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
