http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 23:23 ------- Subject: Re: Inconsistent coverage of private registries in RegistrarBoundaries.pm > Can you clarify: > > If spammer.domain.com is a bad guy and hammer.domain.com is a good guy, > wouldn't *.domain.com catch both of them and therefore FP if hammer.domain.com > appeared in a message body URI? With only the "*.domain.com IN A 127.0.0.x" record, of course. You'd have to add a "hammer.domain.com IN TXT clean" for each clean host. This would cause nothing to be listed in the answer section, but you wouldn't get an NXDOMAIN, you'd get a NOERROR. Of course this (being able to whitelist some and blacklist other hostnames under a domain) is independent of the registrar boundary issue... which may not really be that big of an issue, I don't know. > FWIW We *did* consider these kinds of issues when we (collectively) worked on > the designs. I'd imagined it had been discussed. I'd just wondered why it wasn't adopted. If I had to guess it'd be the extra lookups due to the lack of caching of random or "tracking" hostnames. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
