http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4423
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-22 14:23 ------- 'That is incredibly easy to say. If the mail system were open source that would also be easy. Unfortunately, this is the way Groupwise gives us these messages.' If you found a way to hook SpamAssassin into the queue, it should be no problem to do the same with a small wrapper which does the SMTP header handling and then calls spamassassin. 'The reason why mbox support is in SpamAssassin is that a large group of people probably needed that support. All I'm asking for is the same consideration.' I always thought the mbox support was there for historic reasons only. Seems like somebody added mbx support recently though. That should probably be in ArchiveIterator anyway. But there's an important difference between mbox separators and SMTP information: mbox is very easy to parse and skip while we would need an additional SMTP parser in the other case. Too complex for not enough gain. 'If the answer is no then that is fine.' No :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
