http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4188
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 10:12 ------- Subject: Re: RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH should check address literals -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Your assumption is correct. The rule only fires against n.n.n.n in the > HELO greeting, and doesn't fire against [n.n.n.n] (I don't know if this is > still current, but I doubt this has changed since the report was filed) In many cases in SpamAssassin, this is by design btw -- [n.n.n.n] is the RFC-approved way to do this, while n.n.n.n is more common in spam. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFC1+4cMJF5cimLx9ARAsFXAKC9Shq0fToH8VgDjeyY2gotKtrc5QCgi0FU /IDWE4vCRQ643Tlw0rD7fbY= =bAxD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
