http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-08 15:39 ------- I think "init" and "cleanup" are too generic as terms -- it's not really clear exactly where that'd be called, without reading the spamd source. I'd prefer if they were named as where they are in the code, rather than what they expect the plugin implementation to do; e.g. spamd_child_init() is ok, but the latter would be more something like spamd_child_post_connection_close() . "spamd_child_cleanup" doesn't seem appropriate, since at that point, the spamd child isn't finished yet and still has more connections to deal with. '>The finish callback is called indirectly from Mail::SpamAssassin::finish(). It's not called in spamd.' you know, it really should be... separate issue though. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
