http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4576
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-09 21:29 -------
Received: from 15.254.203.62.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO SERVER) [81.173.228.159]
by hamburg134 with SMTP; 23 Jan 2005 11:53:28 -0000
I'm confused... if helo=SERVER and rdns=15.254.203.62.cust.bluewin.ch (which
forwards to the 62.203.254.15) what is "[81.173.228.159]" (which rdns to
xdsl-81-173-228-159.netcologne.de.)?
Martin:
"Now SA thinks that there has been no authentification in place, and
marks the last hop as untrusted. Too bad ..."
Justin:
"PPS: it'd be nice if we could match up with the GMX SMTP AUTH signature, as we
do for other common MTAs, but that "X-Authenticated" header looks very easily
forgeable. :("
Why would be want to extend the trust path to them (a freemail provider) anyway?
To me this part is a non-issue. If for some weird reason you wanted to you
could just use whitelist_from_rcvd * gmx.de.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
