http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4522
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-13 14:56 ------- ExMH 2.7.2 links the complete URI, but nobody uses that except for me and maybe 5 other people ;) Anyway, *do* the RFCs say that the URI is supposed to be interpreted as "spammer.comJISSTUFF.com"? I thought it was the duty of the document author to use the IDN "xn--foo.dom" form *in the document*, rather than a native "JP納豆.例.jp" form. Is it in fact the UA's job? If it *is* the UA's job, +1 on Sidney's idea. (however I'd prefer to open a new bug, instead of reusing this one, but that's a minor detail.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
