-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
"Loren Wilton" writes: > > You know, I don't know if there'd be a separate bugzilla. good > > question... I think the mostly likely thing would be that the rules > > project stuff would be under the (existing) Rules component in BZ. > > I don't know that BZ would get much use or be of much use in day to day > rules testing and making. But I don't see a problem with it existing. > > It certainly is useful for customers to report their perceived bugs with > existing rules, and perhaps useful for someone to now and then submit a rule > suggestion. This I suspect would mostly be used by people who don't follow > Dev and aren't aware of the existance of the rules subproject. (No reason > an SA user should know anything about how rules come into existance.) > > It might be useful to make sure that we have all of our ducks in a row when > it comes release time, if that concept applies to rules; and it seems to me > that it does, when a new version of SA is released. > > It is probably or possibly is also good for documenting the rules scoring > for a release. yep -- all very good points in my opinion. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDTxqbMJF5cimLx9ARAggGAJ0fYpxOAe7KBw+BaH7g9NNssiEZgQCeM/8m qYb/PHdDRuuB/ZQm5/ETTIA= =BoEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
