-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Alexander K. Seewald writes: > I've tested just training the NB model within SA, and > to some extent it works, but it is unclear how far you can go with > that... at some point it is likely to break down, and rule weight > have to be adapted. By the way, it's worth noting that SpamAssassin's bayes-like probabilistic classifier (in other words the "BAYES_*" rules), and spambayes are almost identical in implementation, so results should be very similar. However, we include a method for expiring data, to control database growth, whereas they do not (afaik); in addition, there's been a few differences in tokenizer features, and the odd constant tweaked. But generally, it should be very close. Having said that, we haven't changed the tokenizer or algorithms in quite a while, and they may have been innovating in the meantime. ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDgirRMJF5cimLx9ARAloJAJ4w/yuyDSiJF4PjzmPUplCF1XBwTgCdGNLD HPiu17jrvLrUAv4Ny6Fq1/A= =g5CY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
