http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4742
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-19 17:42 ------- "If your threshold is 5, then 5.1 is spam and 4.9 is ham." Unfortunately, thats the easy case, here is what happens in reality: If your threshold is 5, then 5.1 is spam and 5.0 is ham, as well as 4.9 is ham. Thats what we see, we see score=5.0 as ham. Because you use different rounding for the score and the stars. This is confusing. I see two solutions, either make spam checking AFTER you've rounded the score, thus both score and stars will be consistent or specify more decimal places as suggested by Sidney. Thus the first solution gives score=5.0 and 5 stars while the second solution gives score=4.981 with 4 stars. Both solutions are ofcourse much more consistent than the current method and don't confuse the user. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
