John Myers wrote: > The rule promotion criteria don't appear to be doing the right thing > with the DATE_IN_* tests. > > These tests are essentially a group. Once one of them has been paid > for, the rest have negligible incremental cost. > > DATE_IN_FUTURE_48_96 is disabled due to lack of hits, but the tests on > either side of it are enabled. Most of the DATE_IN_PAST_ tests are > disabled due to S/O ratios below the cutoff. > > I believe all of these tests should be active. I'm not sure how to > generalize this observation to other sets of eval tests. > >
Maybe we should put rules into groups or buckets and the rule promotion code would add all rules in that group/bucket when any of them are selected. Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
